[Compcomm] So what's going on code-wise? Or what we're working on.

[Robert Carr]

Then you should have started a thread discussing the flaws of emeralds
method, and the advantages to a "real plugin-interface". Marex is
exceedingly reasonable and I'm sure he would discuss the approaches.

Instead you make unfounded comments based on a game of "David says" in
an attempt to drive a thread into an offtopic flamewar.

On 4/28/07, RYX <ryx at ryxperience.com> wrote:
> Why do you think I am not constructive when I try to point out wasted
> effort? I just wanted to mention that it would be the more useful and
> extensible approach to implement a real plugin-interface into gwd
> instead of writing tenth of additional decorators. That is a point on
> David's TODO-list btw, since you guys seem to not take me serious
> anyway ... The engine-idea has proven to be not optimal.
>
> The whole "be a yes-sayer or go away"-attitude of some beryl-people
> badly sucks ... Get some more convincing arguments, otherwise you can be
> sure I won't shut up about the uselessness of emerald and its
> descendants ;) ...
>
> Rico
>
> Am Freitag, den 27.04.2007, 21:19 -0400 schrieb Robert Carr:
> > Likewise. Be constructive or go away.
> >
> > On 4/27/07, Sam Spilsbury <smspillaz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > /me Puts up a fire-proof shield
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/28/07, RYX <ryx at ryxperience.com> wrote:
> > > > Emerald is not very innovate or extensible so why do you waste your time
> > > > with re-implementing that bad approach?
> > > >
> > > > Why don't you instead help David to finish his TODO-list for the
> > > > decorator(s) and implement a proper plugin-interface for it? It is the
> > > > waaay better solution for the decorator-problem and would allow much
> > > > more cool stuff instead of much more decorator-confusion.
> > > >
> > > > Everybody could benefit from that and I am sure David would appreciate
> > > > any help on gwd ...
> > > >
> > > > Am Freitag, den 27.04.2007, 19:12 +0200 schrieb Patrick "Marex" Niklaus:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I hope other developers can post about what they are working on here
> > > as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm currently working on Emerald-2. Basically I'm going to rebase
> > > > > Emerald on the current Gtk-Window-Decorator again, which means proper
> > > > > usage of libdecoration etc. The settings backend of emerald (gkeyfile
> > > > > powered) is already rewritten (even if not fully bug free) and will be
> > > > > used on the rebased version.
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides that I'm trying to be a helping hand when it comes to
> > > debugging/testing.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, on my TODO list is also some work at group plugin, so thats
> > > > > probably what I'm going to do after finishing emerald-2.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > CompComm mailing list
> > > > > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > > > >
> > > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CompComm mailing list
> > > > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > > >
> > > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CompComm mailing list
> > > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CompComm mailing list
> > CompComm at Rock3d.org
> > http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>