[Compcomm] Settings-tool (off-topic)

[Danny Baumann]

Hi,

> I think the bindings to libccs _themselves_ could very well do the whole
> work the library itself does now. Those pyrex files which create the
> _binding_ to libccs are likely as much code as the entire
> compizutil-library (!!!!!!) - only the bindings. Do you get the
> problem? 

I get the problem that you guessed the binding size ;-)
The language bindings are much smaller (23K) than your library (> 40K).
I know that libcompizconfig as a whole is way larger than your lib, but
it also does much more ;-)

> Libccs is overcomplicated in so many ways that it would get extremely
> difficult to add more layers of complexity to it. That's what I try to
> say for months now. But it is obviously difficult to convince C-coders
> that they are thinking too complex ... 

This has nothing to do with programming languages - you know that ;-)

Regards,

Danny

PS: Didn't we agree that we want to discuss that stuff on the forum
? :-P