[Compcomm] CompComm has a real name!

[nesl247]

Jeff, you must have missed my statement.

> No where did I say the ml shouldn't be used for major decisions. But a
> decision to have an artwork contest.. That's retarded.

Meaning, I think MAJOR decisions should be discussed on the ml. Not
every discussion warrants a ml post.

On 6/20/07, Jeffrey Laramie <imnotpc at rock3d.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2007 18:51, nesl247 wrote:
> > No where did I say the ml shouldn't be used for major decisions. But a
> > decision to have an artwork contest.. That's retarded.
> >
> > And a good chunk of the devs use irc: racarr, kristianly, onestone,
> > roico, marex, etc etc.
> >
> > And don't you even dare repeat that "you know - there are people who
> > actually have a real life and don't have time to monitor an
> > irc-channel all day." crap. If you have time to read the ML, you have
> > time to be on IRC.
>
> Easy Alex, this isn't appropriate. You know that I'm not against discussing
> things on IRC, but it isn't always convenient, and important discussions may
> occur while others are at work/school/sleep and unable to participate. Any
> decisions that affect (community) people outside the discussion should occur
> on a medium where opinions/votes can be registered over a period of time,
> i.e. ML, forum, obby. That doesn't mean they can be discussed/argued forever.
> I think any future votes or discussion should have a time limit decided prior
> to starting the discussion.
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>


-- 
Alex Heck - nesl247