[Compcomm] Releases and packaging. And stuff.

[Jeffrey Laramie]

On Thursday 10 May 2007 08:39, Danny Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I talked to David briefly about packaging and he's on board with your
> > good, bad, and ugly naming scheme. He indicated that he would like that
> > he would like to see "the requirement for -good package to be a lot more
> > than bug-free and that plugins should at least work properly to be
> > included in the -ugly package".
>
> Isn't that a bit - umm - unrealistic? I mean, how can a plugin be "a lot
> more than bug free"? What are the additional expectations there? And is
> there any piece of software on earth which is bug-free besides "Hello
> world!"? ;-)

I'm curious about that too and he didn't elaborate. I suspect he's referring 
to issues of design or integration, but I think you should ask him what he 
means.

Jeff