[Compcomm] Release & repo policy

[Danny Baumann]

Hi,

> Cant we just call people who release software 'developers',
> its much easier to understand.

But not always accurate, as my original sentence shows:
"I mean that IMO that number of repos (and thus release sources)..."

is not the same as 

I mean that IMO that number of repos (and thus developers)..."

> Either way it is very possible to have one source release which
> comprises of many sources from many release sources and
> source releases.  Hows that?

That's bullshit.

> >> All the ones that were not in svn obviously did not.
> >>
> >> All the ones that were in svn I marked what revision they were on
> >> my website.
> >>
> >
> > Which is? www.anykeysoftware.co.uk gives me "Hello" - that's all.
> >
> 
> I took it down because it was causing confusion with the extras
> tarball.

Huh? So how can I get the information what's the version of the plugins in
your package?

> > Ok, again:
> > - I talked about your tarball and the lack of reproducibility of its
> source
> > origin / revision.
> > - You responded with statements about the Python plugin.
> >
> > You should ask yourself how those are related and not me.
> >
> 
> I was asking how I was being contradictive.  Maybe you didn't
> mean contradiction?

Maybe, English is not my mother tongue. I meant the English translation of
"Widerspruch" - maybe one of the Germans can jump in here.

> I told you I had a list of all the plugins and their svn revision
> where applicable.

WHERE IS THIS LIST?

Regards,

Danny