[Compcomm] Forum Decision

[Mike Dransfield]

Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> On Sunday 13 May 2007 10:08, Stephen Moore wrote:
>   
>> On 5/13/07, Vasek Potocek <vasek.potocek at post.cz> wrote:
>>     
>>> Jeffrey Laramie napsal:
>>>       
>>>> On Saturday 12 May 2007 18:52, Mike Dransfield wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Thursday 10 May 2007 19:35, Franz Rogar wrote:
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> 2007/5/11, RYX <ryx at ryxperience.com>:
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> What happens to compiz.org? Is it now deprecated? I don't
>>>>>>>> understand how exactly the new forum is meant to integrate with the
>>>>>>>>                 
>>> compiz-website
>>>
>>>       
>>>>>>>> - if it is at all. If it isn't - what do compiz users do if they
>>>>>>>>                 
>>> want
>>>
>>>       
>>>>>>>> support? Go to the opencompositing-forums? That is a highly
>>>>>>>> unprofessional presentation of compiz and its greatness.
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> I'm 100% with you. Just why not do a redirection from
>>>>>>>               
>>> forum.compiz.org
>>>
>>>       
>>>>>>> to opencompositing.org? Just an idea (not very elegant but... a
>>>>>>> solution).
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> This should work fine.
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Would this involve deleting all the posts on the current forum?
>>>>>           
>>>> No, I think the current compiz forum should be "frozen" as a RO
>>>> subforum
>>>>         
>>> of
>>>
>>>       
>>>> the opencompositing.org forum. As I said earlier, it's possible to
>>>>         
>>> import the
>>>
>>>       
>>>> current forums using vB, but I think a RO link as a subforum gives us
>>>>         
>>> nearly
>>>
>>>       
>>>> the same benefit without the effort of:  import-compiz + import-beryl +
>>>> convert vB to phpbb2. If Rico and Arturo port the current compiz forum
>>>>         
>>> theme
>>>
>>>       
>>>> to the combined forum, we can change the link on compiz.org and the
>>>>         
>>> combined
>>>
>>>       
>>>> forum will become part of the compiz site.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>>         
>>> What about topics not influenced by the change, e.g., Screenlets and
>>> maybe "Ideas / Feature requests"? There are some
>>> open discussions there.
>>>       
>> what if the really active ones are ported to the new forums and then give a
>> month or so when people can nominate particular threads to be ported to new
>> forums, after which no new threads can be ported....
>>
>> seeing as it's only a small forum (especially when compared to the old
>> beryl forums, that shouldn't be too hard??)
>>     
>
> I agree with you and Vasek and I think it would be great if we could import a 
> few of the important threads and keep them active. I just don't know how 
> difficult it is to import individual threads. Maybe some people with better 
> sql/php skills than I have can comment on the feasibility of doing this.
>   

Just because a thread is not active NOW does not mean that it
will not ever become active.

Everyone who has registered and set their preferences to notify
on new posts will lose all contact and think their feature request/bug
is being ignored.  Like RYX says, its all very unprofessional and
sloppy.

Now can you please explain the scope of the forum?

Would it not be a bit strange for compiz users to go to a forum
called compcomm (or whatever) for support?  Will the new
forum even support compiz (without the extra plugins and setting
stuff)?

Nobody has ever explained other than saying that compiz is the
core, we are different.  If that is the case, then compiz still needs
a support forum and you are doing the same thing as the beryl
fork by removing that.


> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> CompComm mailing list
> CompComm at Rock3d.org
> http://www.ubaight.com/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
>